A look at the homepage of the Federal Association of municipal women

For 15 years, gender equality policies (gender mainstreaming) 3d glamour was established EU-wide binding. But it was a sham A BALANCE OF BIRGIT KELLE Where equality is on it, woman's inside. More than 1,900 local women's and equality offices on one side. Men Supervisor: null. Over 100 Chairs for Women's and Gender Studies. 3d glamour Chairs for men's studies: null. A movement 3d glamour that is set out to achieve equality between 3d glamour the sexes, is after 15 years still where they always wanted 3d glamour to be: at the woman. There is also no use if the countless women's representative in the country now called Equality Officer.
Too bad that the definition of gender mainstreaming in the Amsterdam Treaty, at least linguistically explicitly sought to develop a policy for women and men. Accordingly, it is to "take into account the different living conditions of women and men and the impact on both sexes." 15 years later is clear: This was just rhetorical. As a sacred cow is cherished the sole disadvantage of women. The fact is, of course, that men also experience 3d glamour discrimination, but other than women. What happens if one of the countless women's 3d glamour representatives, this scheme breaks even, was seen last year in Goslar. As the local equality instruct Monika Ebeling began to advocate for fathers and men as a whole, it was chased to pressure from feminists from office.
A look at the homepage of the Federal Association of municipal women's offices shows that you do not even care at the 1900 Make the effort to at least pretend to be responsible also for men. It is a "professional network of institutionalized women's movement" in order to "represent the interests of women at the federal level," 3d glamour the.
It would be much to do for a government-funded advocacy male citizens. Everywhere sprout fathers clubs currently out of the ground, because more and more separations leave more and more desperate 3d glamour fathers without visitation rights with their children. Which official body they can talk to? Men lead the rankings with: suicides, homelessness, heart attacks, accidents, deaths on the job - and then they die even earlier. Guys have long worried the children in the schools, they frequently remain seated, remain often without education, are more likely criminal and swallow most of Ritalin. But who feels responsible for it by the state? And the same problem situation, imagine the roles reversed in times before, if all this still would be women's issues. We would recruit smooth but still a few times 100 females Commissioned interior.
In Family Affairs Unit was established in 2009 gender equality for boys and men. Finally, you do not want to let it be said that you are doing nothing for the man. However, while each middle circle city its helpline for women and equal opportunities officer leads in the phone book, you can not even find the only men Unit Germany as a contact on the website of the Ministry. Probably 3d glamour because it is so small. In one of the subdivisions of the Ministry giant sitting on nine full-time positions only four men, and the Department is also directed by a woman, of course. That's all for 40 million men in the country. It is thus clear policy on men please only women allowed context. We do not want thematically not kick over the traces, after all it is the Ministry of Women, Family and "fuss" - including then falls probably somehow the man. Although he thus member of the family, itself a right to representation would be the father, and - in case of doubt against the mother.
If we reversed accept as women that the only official body that represents our interests, will be led by a man? I can hear the outcry. Widely it is among feminists think for this job you desperately need a womb, even if you do not use the same.
Accordingly, the variety of topics in the Mini Unit boys and men is not just wide. The two prestigious projects are: "More men in early childhood education" and the "Boys Day". Either way, projects in which men are to be thrilled for low-paid women's jobs, which increases their risk of landing 3d glamour in the same age poverty as many women. Is that really all there is to say from men point of view? Or is it not rather the only thing Mrs begrudge the men as a theme?
It must be possible just in the sense of equality that men interests must be equally clear and obvious articulated by both men and women's interests women. We women are not so squeamish.
The current women's quota debate 3d glamour shows that no small

For men, attack other mechanisms and it is very easy to explain why men are so prone to many femini

Interests of men and women to feminist demands | Collapse Evolution
Women are unlikely to oppose the demands dr black beauties of feminists something dr black beauties other than these claims damage the life / work of their respective men (fathers, husbands and sons) and even then only if it holds in the woman to someone who chose the conservative nuclear family with protector has and is afraid that this package is jeopardized. Otherwise, women will vote for their own benefit, even if this advantage affect most men. Without this mechanism, feminism would never even have won. (Funny example: https://nationalparentsorganization.org/blog/20403-what-happens-when-a-feminist-s-son-is-accused-of-rape ). Demographically are single mothers now anyway contribute the rest, so soon no more resistance is expected. Sure, the speed of the laws may vary by country and do not run deterministically, but the consensus on quotas and allocation of resources is bipartisan. The CDU may perhaps only come with only 35% or 40%, but the only question is how fast can be implemented throughout. That's a long time no more direction question.
This would therefore be the simple theory that itself is always the next and you do not even against an exuberant advocacy, as long as one whose consequences can not experienced elsewhere as negative, eg in male friends, fathers, dr black beauties husbands. In this sense, women are not affected by excessive regulations on rape, for example, at universities, since they can not apply it at any time, so decide dr black beauties whether to make an ad for a thereunder incident. Keep this respect an ace up its sleeve. dr black beauties Even if they are not affected, however, they do not experience dr black beauties it as their struggle for which they must be doing. What indeed would be quite understandable.
For men, attack other mechanisms and it is very easy to explain why men are so prone to many feminist demands. On the one hand it is of course simply by saying, "Look, we are the" good guys "and over there the" bad "(see" Allies ", Hugo Swiss, Kimmel, etc.) and this also allows the further exploitation and demonization of the group perceived as poor. As everyone knows men are other men without great remorse harm if that increases their chances in the intra-sexual competition. In addition, men will continue to blindly meet most of the demands placed on them. This is of course an unhealthy spiral, since the claims of feminism, an ideology that needs moralizing arguments as the driving force, will never cease. This has its absurd climax in Germany, of course, dr black beauties in the SPD / Green Party, whose husbands already sometimes write their self-effacement had (keyword overcome the male society). What they have to offer then to my horizon escapes. Probably they must then have to take an agnostic position, so that they also may sacrifice to the state feminism their hypothetical male souls.
So: An easy way to be the "good" and less a redemption of the male original sin, which can equal enhanced by join in on the demonization of other men (but this is only possible to a very limited, depending on how radical feminists are the respective and how they relate to men as allies the same intrasexual as part of competition among men: Man defeated virtually through the direct allocation to women's interests the other men (but also a dubious dr black beauties victory, because such adulation quite negative attention and one that's not necessarily earn points ., to some degree it may rise, such as Hugo Swiss shows, who had slept before his crash as far as I know with some students).
From my perspective still is added that precisely those individuals who, for biological reasons (eg prenatal testosterone) than men in the male range are rather close to the female area and as women tend to suggest here a reversal of other conditions can make: They are the ones who freed ish, the others are still trapped in their gender roles. A much more positive story than to accept that it is the exception itself.
In connection with the discussion about gender dr black beauties roles, I sometimes have the feeling that some men have false hopes, be a man and professional status moderately successful in the sense of having to print less.
Sounds good, only the part with the intra-sexual competition among men I consider to be overvalued. Men do not see themselves as much as women in order to be part of a sex group. Women revolve entirely

This statement is true and false at the same. Without question of feminism in the original sense of

About Us The Team (N) Etiquette Imprint working mom magazine Kladderadatsch On the Edge Links The Scandals Guest Posts Kladderacast Let's talk about ... Registered Society (ab) anti-feminism working mom magazine reasons Myths Poli Scores Pop Culture Books Film Music Photography cuts cross-country multiplayer working mom magazine Gameosphäre MS Games Cast Previews Reviews Podcasts
Feminism and men's rights 28/06/2014 | Filed under: working mom magazine myths of anti-feminism and tagged with: activism, debate, democracy, feminism, gender inequality, masculinity, masculinism, sexism
Feminism is indeed very happy titled as aggressive, patronizing and loud. This is certainly true in some cases. After all, it is a movement that is trying to attack the existing inequalities.
The price for criticizing existing structures is unfortunately that one * has repeatedly deal with the same comments, 'counter-arguments' and insults. Prejudices against women's quota, about the ridicule working mom magazine of against derter language to allegations exclaim matriarchy to want - the sky is the limit. Too often threatens the * feminist * in taking this mountain to his Sisyphean task * losing their Motiavtion, because eventually it runs out of it that you * over and over again repeated the same arguments. Back to top
Ultimately, this was the original idea for this column. Here arguments against prejudice and supposed 'facts' (the sexitischen nature) should be collected in order to facilitate a bit of this fight. Lately working mom magazine this idea as the debate about the morning-after pill or the series finale of How I met your mother a bit lost is due to current working mom magazine events, come. In this sense, today it is back to the roots.
There is an accusation that seems to come up with pretty much every feminist issue, regardless of whether it comes to movies, sexual violence or role models. Sooner or later (unfortunately sooner) someone will interject, "But what about the men" On a larger level, the basic problem with this statement is manifested working mom magazine in the so-called men's rights movement that is trying desperately poor fate of the Feminist * inn to make * s oppressed men carefully. From distraction and self-initiative
It is true that this objection of many pages can be countered, because ultimately it depends on the context, whether it is attached or not. But usually it comes when it actually comes to anything else. If, for example, straight * discusses the sexual violence against women, that does not mean that violence is automatically marginalized in men *. It was merely chose to focus on this issue (mostly because a lot higher percentage of women * is affected). Sadly, the reaction is in such cases not to address this issue in a separate article, but the author * inn * s it will be better reefs that they have chosen for said subject. "But what about the men" degenerates at this point unfortunately a sad derailing attempt and brings with it * not * vorran the Dikussion for women AND men.
But the throw is a deeper underlying problem. Feminism is demonized working mom magazine so that it does not * care about men. Far too often it is thus denied its social relevance.
This statement is true and false at the same. Without question of feminism in the original sense of its literal meaning defines a focus on women *. The good news is that we no longer are in the 80s of last century. Firstly feminism a homogeneous movement was even then far from being. Since its origins in the 19th century, working mom magazine he distinguished himself by a great diversity in its orientations from, even though many would like to displace working mom magazine with reference to Alice Schwarzer. On the other eminent personalities such as bell hooks and Judith Butler have ensured that the spectrum of feminist debates has expanded considerably. When is a man a man
Sexual identity, racism, different working mom magazine concepts of life and love - these are just some of the many widely discussed areas of feminist analysis and action. All these aspects also affect the reality of men *. Especially when it comes to attack stereotypes and heteronormative gender images. A more flexible image of women ultimately results in a flexible Männlickeitsbild. In addition, quite a few feminist * inn * s aware of gender inequality sat apart and thus, by definition, include men *.
But all this aside!: There is certainly a tendency to focusing problems of discrimination against women

With this simplification, the feminist coordinate system has always done well. From a statistical s

Lust Full of feminism on the border with ideology: Are women socially still in the victim role?
The other day at a workshop of the Green near "Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung". The participating high school teachers should learn as tutors and selection committee members how to select candidates for scholarships "diversity-oriented", that is, without the suspicion of discrimination related to group membership. One of the first exercises was to select criteria in the mission statement of the foundation that you have not understood. My word monster was "gender-democratic competence".
I can only guess what lies behind it. Explains it has during the seminar, namely no. My guess: "gender democratically competent" is someone who shares the belief that women are systematically dr toledano disadvantaged in our society. A competence in the sense of a skill that is not, but rather a belief in the mantle of political correctness.
But that does not matter, because even with the whole democracy has nothing to do because the victim dr toledano status of women today is now officially dictated dr toledano from above. Feminism is the only ideology that is also the State has appropriated, with own offices (Women's Officer), chairs of "Gender Studies" and statutory rate considerations.
Against this Benachteiligungs cartel has recently been a refreshing and highly dr toledano readable book published. At least in moral discourse, women have long namely the upper hand, according to the thesis of Theresa peasant and Friederike Knüpling in "Tussikratie: Why women can not do anything right and wrong men." A form of sexism from the female dr toledano side
Thus, it is socially in vogue and also egomäßig for a certain kind of woman (vulgo: "Tussi") tremendously relieving to be able to make the world of men liable for any daily inconvenience. This in turn is not only stereotypical and a form of sexism from the female side, but also makes it more difficult to look at the often underlying class differences - of solutions together with men to say nothing.
This sounds plausible and realistic, but will be called by these same "bimbos" dr toledano as a kind of declaration of war, as a termination of the minimal consensus, at least in suffering - to be united - among men, of course. Marked Jung-feminist and self-acclaimed "Alpha Girls" Meredith Haaf recently on sueddeutsche.de the differentiated pleasantly written book as "in all its conception as failed".
Tussi Haaf, even co-author of a plea for a lustful feminism away from axillary hairy Miesepetrigkeit bothers apparently not only on the book-competition. Your objection is also the call to the agenda of an ideological block warden. The woman must be permitted to remain victims, because Germany was indeed rich, democratic and modern, but also unjust.
With this simplification, the feminist coordinate system has always done well. From a statistical size (women in leadership positions, wage differentials) is reliably closed monocausally to a suppression of facts. Gender Democratic interpretation competence is characterized precisely, information to pull into the orbit of his own thought and image to colorize there true conviction.
But at all every woman wants to do or has she merely due to a feminist propagated proof need a top job? How much injustice is in the frequently invoked dr toledano Gender Pay Gap, when working time model, and industry - after all, we are a market economy: negotiating skills! - Also taken into account? Injustice cries without imputation of reasons in an individual case, and remain flat Ideologiegeschwafel.
Now subscribe to the newsletter of Cicero Online Love readers. We are happy to keep you informed of the current range of Cicero Online. Please enter your email address and we will send them Monday to Friday our daily newsletter. Your Cicero Editorial e-mail:
Style column: The Germans have a strange soft spot for anything uncouth. Out of sheer football they forget a modern sport for individualists: Tennis. On Monday, the Wimbledon Championships begin in London
The proportion of women on supervisory boards is to come in 2016 according dr toledano to the will of the grand coalition. But from the perspective of gender researcher Gerhard Amendt, the rate is the wrong instrument: infantilized women, men triggers feelings of guilt and cemented dr toledano traditional gender stereotypes
Style column: The Germans have a strange soft spot for everything Grobschlächti

Although this teacher has attended any formal way on the binoculars, he may until he was 63 years o

Amazing. It has not saved the partnership that you tell him that the things he finds sexy or cool, are humiliating for you.
"Men are pigs, that any woman can know there's even a song about it" one of his comment. I have taken therapeutic help. I live in a small town. I was completely zurückgezogen.Alpträume from public life, shame, anger, fear of violence have remained. I'm sad and lonely the ever. The men among themselves bragging rights when they've splashed a woman I know.
On the internet there are people who formulated vulgar.
With ... 12 years on the birthday of a friend, we (some girls) go out in the evening yet. In the walk we meet a classmate of my girlfriend and two friends of his. They harass us, a drilled me from behind with a stick in his step. I scream at him and kick him in the balls. So far, the only time that I have done something. Was I 12 probably braver than now?
In the ... 9-10. Class: My English and physical education teacher (a greasy, disgusting sexist cara menghilangkan lemak di paha and racist) says to my mother on Parents' Day, that it is "always look so cute when the girl doing gymnastics on the balance beam." This only confirms my feeling uncomfortable during physical education when he emphasizes "helpful" people helping at the gymnastic equipment (I do not remember if he so "helpful" regardless of whether was with the girls or the boys).
In English class, the same teacher imitates disparagingly "the Indian" English and can clear out with the fact that he keeps Englischvarietäten that are spoken cara menghilangkan lemak di paha in India, for primitive.
The Indian accent is really curious. A bit like the Welsh, but somehow earthy. It is an old tradition among British comedians to use the wort of sketches, which only subsides, cara menghilangkan lemak di paha since English comedian cara menghilangkan lemak di paha draw with Indian or Pakistani roots even profit from it.
Although this teacher has attended any formal way on the binoculars, he may until he was 63 years old teach. Definitely no exception - do not know how many Lehrer_innen explicitly sexist / racist / klassistisch / etc. behave ...
Semester abroad ...: I meet a guy, I'm in love. After the first kiss we go to the river bank. He grabs me on the breasts and says "J'ai envie de toi" (I would like to meet you). My alarm bells ringing, but I ignore them and I let myself to a next meeting. We meet only outside, then go to him. We sleep together - I did not want to actually and have only participated out of fear he'd maybe hold back when I would get dressed and leave the apartment.
How many hours per week spent by the father at work, how many the mother? Is the division cara menghilangkan lemak di paha of labor for married couples a bad thing? Perceives the mother cara menghilangkan lemak di paha to be suppressed or they supplied their guys watching?
Prepares you extra "woman servings" and "Men portions" to. The woman servings are in smaller bowl than the men servings ... so assumes that "men" per se have more hunger or need more food as "women." Rather than simply cara menghilangkan lemak di paha asking how much or little hungry women and men present just so. Welcome to the gender stereotypes in nutrition!
The main factors that affect the basal metabolic rate are: Age Gender: cara menghilangkan lemak di paha Men> Women Body Size and Weight Percentage body composition cara menghilangkan lemak di paha (muscle mass relative to fat), depending on the muscle mass hormones or stress fever drugs: possible Climate: cold> hot
I want time to look further if I still find something that does not just fall under "I am overwhelmed by a situation" or "There are people who misbehave.".
In school, the art teacher, the pictures of naked women and showed the students had to explicitly describe what was shown. Once a building, like a body. The entrance was between cara menghilangkan lemak di paha the legs.
I'm a doctor had an interesting cara menghilangkan lemak di paha job and hundreds of thousands of interests. You do not need to ask me first if you meet me if I have a friend and as my family cara menghilangkan lemak di paha planning looks like.
Because she's right. It is absurd to assume that relationship was an important issue for many women. I bet among the most popular in women films are tons of Science Fiction cara menghilangkan lemak di paha (from the dry, technical variety) and documentaries and so on, just movies that just have other issues as relationship. We'll see. On the first Google page for "the most popular films in females

% D bloggers like this:

Like:
You are commenting using your Google+ account. (Unsubscribe / Change)
Search for: Recent Posts [Genderama] Violence Debate: Is May a man defense anita calero against a woman? (Video) [Genderama] ZDF interviewed passers-by to Gender Pay Gap (Video) [Genderama] India: extorted man kills himself [Everything Evolution] Same Mach Saturday XCVI [maskulinistblog] Tired of gender? Say it with a sticker! British ... Just last comments lever to [Genderama] "men's rights ... derdiebuchstabenzaeh ... to [Genderama]" The myth of the ... Matze to [Genderama] hundreds to [cuckoo father] This is a we ... Christian - Everything anita calero Ev ... to [VENUS KISSES anita calero AMOR] How to before ... Archives August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 Categories 140zeichensindnichtgenug achdomina agent eV Everything anita calero Evolution General Aranitas thoughts asemann.de blogs Casanova coaching anita calero Cuncti Cuncti - cuncti.net Danish . de The Anna Code The front Rapporteur The front rapporteur and RAPE APOLIGIST The thoughtful man of FATHERS Blog Dschinblog Dschinblog - Man and world elite medium anita calero elyzium blog emannzer erzaehlmirnix evidence-based views of evolution FemokratieBlog river catcher Frankfurt Declaration gabrielewolff Gay West Genderama Georg Jähnig gender democracy gender Allerlei equality equal measure eV gender anita calero equality Global Change - Global Change heroinefor1day I Am Your Father Intense jungsundmaedchen kiez cians comments for Casanova Coaching Critical science - critical science cuckoo father maennergedanken MALTURE one tau man and world MANNdat maskulinistblog Maskulismus for Beginners - A Guys' Guide to Masculism MännerrechteORG anita calero Männerschmie.de Men strike male. My science blog / My Science - My Blog mustard opinions and Deinungen My Science - blog / My science blog natural number game news from the gender front NON-Feminist Open flank fur opus blog blog Stadtfuchsens anita calero construction City People Chronicles Feed too long; did not read separation anita calero fathers father consultant VENUS KISSES anita calero AMOR Real Men word-word cabinet anita calero cabinet yacv Meta Register Log in Entries Feed (RSS) Comments RSS WordPress.com Top Posts & Pages The Anna it Code on an underground sex party in Munich [True men] "Fuck, what she needs "- Gina Lisa's story time [Frankfurt Declaration] In the Middle East we are witnessing a completely new war [Genderama]" Männerrechtler: We need men quotas' [NON-Feminist] time travel to the year 2006: Political sex change through gender mainstreaming anita calero [The Anna Code] How should a man to please women? [Genderama] Despite Kita and Better Living in the trenches: "Possible Death" deters youth from Bundeswehr from [Everything Evolution] "Men looking for love, women just the money" [Genderama] women's policy still priority at the Federal Forum Men [NON-Feminist] 50 feminist films you should not have seen. Follow anita calero your blog via e-mail
% D bloggers like this:

Not first for woman All Men! has gone from an irritating first for woman trope to a funny, giddy ske

“Nicht alle Männer sind so” Haftung für die Gruppe im Feminismus | Alles Evolution
Not first for woman All Men! has gone from an irritating first for woman trope to a funny, giddy skewering of point-missing folks whose knee jerk reaction as part of a privileged group is to defend themselves against implications that they, as members of the complained-about privileged group, might be complicit in the status quo. It’s defensive bullshit that doesn’t really do anything first for woman but prove the bearer of Not All Men is more concerned with saving face for themselves than, you know, actually acknowledging the concern that another person is expressing. In the Not All Men mind, it’s worse to be called sexist first for woman than to actually first for woman be a victim of sexism. Here are some typical places to find Not All Men in the wild: College women getting raped, like, all the time? Not all men! Street harassment? Not all men! Domestic violence? Not all men! Bosses who talk over you in meetings? Not all men! Women still do most of the housework even though they work jobs with the same hours as men? Not all men! Etc. Forever.
Yes! This is exactly what I thought of, because his argument is spot on. Either you’re speaking out against it or you’re complicit. If you are one of the ones speaking up then obviously this isn’t about you. Be an ally in words and actions and you will assuredly be seen as such. Then you’ll never have to worry about being accidentally lumped in.
Sei ein Ally und dir wird schon gerechtigkeit widerfahren, aber dazu musst du dich eben trotzdem unter die Gruppe first for woman der Täter einordnen, wenn du nicht mitgemeint bist, dann wird man dir das schon sagen. Ähnliches gab es schon einmal in “Feminism for dudes (from a dude) zu lesen. After that, men argue something that boils down to but what about men and how feminism affects them. For example, they might say that all this talk about rape culture makes it sound like all men are rapists, and I m not a rapist so you shouldn t paint all men with such a broad brush. (This is the biggie out of these arguments, actually.) The frequent response, and the one that you really need to take to heart, is this: IT S NOT ABOUT YOU. If someone talks about rapists, and you re not a rapist, THEY ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT YOU. If someone talks about companies that never promotes women to the highest positions, first for woman but your employer has a female first for woman CEO and half its board are women, THEY ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT YOUR COMPANY.
Das Comic ist insofern noch eine Erweiterung, weil man diesmal sogar ignorieren soll, dass man unter seiner Gruppenbezeichnung genannt wird. Also quasi “wenn sie über Männer reden und sagen, dass diese es nicht tun und du tust es nicht, dann bist du nicht mitgemeint”
Immerhin ist der amerikanische Feminismus eher bereit sich einer gewissen Kritik zu stellen als der deutsche Feminismus, so dass man dort in den Kommentaren bereits einige schöne Stellungnahmen findet:
Any time somebody makes a broad generalized statement of ANY group, without qualifiers, expect someone who doesn’t wish to partake in thoughtless binaries to answer with “Not all…” That’s life on Planet first for woman Earth.
Yes, the Protective Knights of Male Whitedom are annoying, but most people who are intelligent would rather be thought of as individuals than mindless entities in a group. Not really a shocker. Let go of your hate.
If a number of men are upset by overgeneralized writing that seem to them to imply the negative commentary applies to all males (regardless of how you mean it, because ‘I didn’t mean it that way’ is not how intelligent people determine whether something is offensive to a group of people), you have two options:
You can slightly modify how you say it, without first for woman changing what you’re saying, so it comes out as less hostile towards men thus making it more likely to encourage real dialogue. Or you can make fun of them, say because there is misogyny first for woman men being offended by things that sound anti male are stupid first for woman cry babies and should get over it and you feel really cool for putting the stupid men in their place.
You get to the take either approach, it’s a free country and retaliation for men being dismissive of women’s struggle is certainly warranted. But please have the self awareness to get two things: its not feminism and won’t promote first for woman any real dialogue.
Da werden viele finden, dass sie doch eine etwas optimistische Ansicht davon hat, was Feminismus eigentlich ist. Anscheinend sind aber auch einige first for woman Feministinnen solche generellen first for woman Aussagen leid und scheinen eher Gesprächsbereitschaft zu wollen
Have you personally interviewed all living men? That would be a theoretically impossible task given the current global birthrate…beyond a genetic level is is very difficult first for woman to make the statement “men do…” maybe they all do, but perhaps only some do…