Feminism always comes up from time to time in the debate. In the autumn I discussed (debated) topic

Our young Euro election candidates from the party meeting of the occasion. We are remembered mm. fine we made a caricature of the boards. I got to keep the young äänikuninkaana (or queen?) Speech of thanks on behalf glamour living of all of us five.
Feminism always comes up from time to time in the debate. In the autumn I discussed (debated) topic in one column long, when the subject rose to the surface. Similarly, the euro countries was the electoral lists, women's organizations exist of necessity, and a candidate for the European elections in our main theme. And now it seems that the last three weeks is again pulpahdellut feminist texts here and there. There are men "Week feminist"'s essay, Random columns of Ilkka-Journal (of course, gender is of significance), Jutta Urpilainen opening of Hienohelman comments for Helsingin Sanomat, glamour living and so on and so forth. After all these. Also, a couple kanssabloggaajaa wrote on his blog (Flower Flip: Miss Representative, as well as Sofia and #YesallWomen).
In the case of self-feminist inviting, begins inttäminen equality and feminism. It is said that if you want to equality, is a feminist. Point. And everyone should be proud of it and carry it with pride and keep the title of gender equality issues on the agenda. And women's issues. That it now only is every woman's task. That women are networking with each other.
This brings me to my opinion, the essentials: What is feminism? What has it been? Who defines it? Is there a line feminists such as political parties, with the majority to decide the party's line, policies, etc..
Gender Quotas, insisted, women's, a man thing, the glass ceiling? What is sex? Why equality should be used for self-driving sukupuolimäärittynyttä feminist-word? Does gender play a role? Does or does it need to emphasize? glamour living Should women's organizations aim to make itself redundant? Are we at that point? If we do not, when are we?
Or What 's it is. Policy women's organization to do? The drive gender equality? Family glamour living policy? Will the women themselves frost this? Why divide glamour living the sexes in different organizations? Why not be able to work in the same organization? glamour living
I got probably hated my neck when I'm gone so our party of women candidates yhteiskannariin. But for what I am involved in politics? Why give up at this stage to the purposes and principles? What kannarilla achieved and why not take a stand for example. Kohdstuvaan men and children to violence? Are these not the individual level just as nasty (if not men against glamour living women even worse, when the men of violence does not yet take into account the large masses, and it is more of a laughing stock)?
Why only one gender (women) advocacy of gender equality? The individual? What really changed if the highest elected women? Would not a more significant change would be achieved when given to different individuals of space? At the moment when the leading positions they seek much hard men and women, "softer" - both men and women - there is no gap. So how gender quotas to change glamour living the situation? Should be a rather different personality types of places quotas?
This blog became a lot of questions about the text. Maybe the next will be to your early reply. And so. I'm not a feminist, although I am in favor of equality and gender-sensitive education. I would say, rather, that just because I do not want to label myself as sukupuolimäärittyneellä name. So feminism as kepulaisuuskin are each self-defined. No one can determine the identity of another. Or is it? It help if I say that you are the kind of Kepu, if you a fan of civilization, humanity, sustainable relationship with nature and equality?
Oh, my comment would lose something? Piece of Marianne later to check whether it is published, and if not sooo naputan again :) By the way has brought me to Wanted conscience-post about the rest of the acts of the population growth;) Miss The representative then again it is women's issues, but do these also sort of ties in with each other;) ReplyDelete
Sorry, it is now corrected. Linkkasin only urgent e-mail, of its title with a comment "mark off" :) ... and a shame that the text was lost in cyberspace, I hope to write you holding up yet again. Remove
I think it is exciting in itself, for example, write a lot of feminism, and to keep himself up proudly as a feminist, but when I link this writing, will comment: "All right, you are not a feminist. Consider what is the point of feminism." Or, "Kepu comparison fails because the dictionary definition does not have that." Argh. :) It is in this society, I think we go into the woods. Judged for example. Variety of ideas without glamour living the knowledge of their history, or without considering their values and goals, or ways in which tavotteihiin achieved. It's just so great to have something that is on their own would be cool, that it will be ready. It was now, even if it is feminism, or a laborer