Other studies have also obtained similar results. For example, the mathematical abilities of school

This (too) blog comment department will matter little out of arguments, in which social inequality is justified biology and invoked, for example, men and women in a variety of genes, or get rid of intelligence. I've recently been reading Cordelia Fine's mainota opuses "Delusions of Gender" [1], which is quite a lot of good perspectives on these questions. The following are some of them.
The social distinction between acts of biology justify their arguments are tricky, because the borderline between biology and culture, there is considerable difficulty. impression in style For example, today's brain research highlights precisely the continuous interaction between genes, brain function, and the environment. The genes we have for granted, but it depends impression in style on how genes are activated by the environment. Thinking, learning and perception directly affect the brain's structure. That is why, for example, a discussion of men and women differently impression in style functioning of the brain is not simply a debate about biology or immutable differences between men and women, but just as much about how the environment of society and social life affect the shape of the brain connections.
"In addition to having the longest period during Which brain growth is shaped by the environment, human beings alter the environment shapes That Their brains to a degree without precedent among animals ... It is this accessability to shape the environment That in turn shapes our brains That has allowed human adaptability and capability to Develop at a much faster rate than is possible through the genetic code Itself. This transgenerational shaping of brain function through culture means That Also Processes That govern the evolution of societies and cultures have a great Influence is how our individual brains and minds work. "
It is of course not the fact that the genes would not be of any value, but the fact that the genes - although limited by a specific way of human progress - do not completely specify the development of the final result. In biology, it is a question the possibilities and potential impression in style and not the whole unchanged. This often seems to be forgotten when, at what gender differences justified by biological differences.
This point is illustrated to studying this in more detail in the comment section of the blog to the argument that men are more than women, as well as "peaks" and "losers". [2] This "Greater Male Variety" hypothesis is toisteltu already in the early 1900s from an argument as to why men are more than women in high positions. impression in style
The 2000s, the most famous is probably responsible impression in style for the claim by Harvard University, former President Lawrence Summers, who argued that the inherent differences between women and men of talent could explain why science and mathematics among the peaks are so few women. Summers set up a conjecture specifically for the variation among men (intelligence, as well as other properties) is higher and therefore the peaks is more.
The argument for men's increased the variation is justified by the early 1920s study, which looked at 80 000 Scottish child's IQ, and found that on average it was the same for girls and boys, but boys had more variation. The existence of gender differences, as already pointed to, does not tell us anything about why the differences are, or whether they were necessary. The difference impression in style detection study does not demonstrate that it was based on the unchanging biological causes.
Modern studies have shown that men's greater variation mental impression in style capabilities is not static or necessary. For example, in the early 2000s, the study found that gender differences in verbal, mathematical impression in style and spatial perception abilities of variation occurring in the United States yes, but not the other surveyed countries. Each part of the sampled area (verbal, mathematical, spatial abilities) found in the countries where women's achievements had more variation than men. [3]
Other studies have also obtained similar results. For example, the mathematical abilities of schoolchildren studying impression in style has been observed that these American impression in style children in the case of white boys have more variations, while Asian Americans with regard to girls. [4]
It's how well the child or adult is successful in mathematical ability (or intelligence) tests that measure is also not an automatic indicator exceptional intrinsic intelligence. Mathematical talent quiz Study of Mathematically precocious youth - the experiment in 1980 identified a very talented boys was one of 13 girls each. In 2005, the ratio had dropped so that the talented boys was only 2.8 per one girl. [5] This is how big the change is unlikely to explain the coincidence, or a sudden change impression in style in the genetic talent away - the question is to whom is given the opportunity