A look at the homepage of the Federal Association of municipal women

For 15 years, gender equality policies (gender mainstreaming) 3d glamour was established EU-wide binding. But it was a sham A BALANCE OF BIRGIT KELLE Where equality is on it, woman's inside. More than 1,900 local women's and equality offices on one side. Men Supervisor: null. Over 100 Chairs for Women's and Gender Studies. 3d glamour Chairs for men's studies: null. A movement 3d glamour that is set out to achieve equality between 3d glamour the sexes, is after 15 years still where they always wanted 3d glamour to be: at the woman. There is also no use if the countless women's representative in the country now called Equality Officer.
Too bad that the definition of gender mainstreaming in the Amsterdam Treaty, at least linguistically explicitly sought to develop a policy for women and men. Accordingly, it is to "take into account the different living conditions of women and men and the impact on both sexes." 15 years later is clear: This was just rhetorical. As a sacred cow is cherished the sole disadvantage of women. The fact is, of course, that men also experience 3d glamour discrimination, but other than women. What happens if one of the countless women's 3d glamour representatives, this scheme breaks even, was seen last year in Goslar. As the local equality instruct Monika Ebeling began to advocate for fathers and men as a whole, it was chased to pressure from feminists from office.
A look at the homepage of the Federal Association of municipal women's offices shows that you do not even care at the 1900 Make the effort to at least pretend to be responsible also for men. It is a "professional network of institutionalized women's movement" in order to "represent the interests of women at the federal level," 3d glamour the.
It would be much to do for a government-funded advocacy male citizens. Everywhere sprout fathers clubs currently out of the ground, because more and more separations leave more and more desperate 3d glamour fathers without visitation rights with their children. Which official body they can talk to? Men lead the rankings with: suicides, homelessness, heart attacks, accidents, deaths on the job - and then they die even earlier. Guys have long worried the children in the schools, they frequently remain seated, remain often without education, are more likely criminal and swallow most of Ritalin. But who feels responsible for it by the state? And the same problem situation, imagine the roles reversed in times before, if all this still would be women's issues. We would recruit smooth but still a few times 100 females Commissioned interior.
In Family Affairs Unit was established in 2009 gender equality for boys and men. Finally, you do not want to let it be said that you are doing nothing for the man. However, while each middle circle city its helpline for women and equal opportunities officer leads in the phone book, you can not even find the only men Unit Germany as a contact on the website of the Ministry. Probably 3d glamour because it is so small. In one of the subdivisions of the Ministry giant sitting on nine full-time positions only four men, and the Department is also directed by a woman, of course. That's all for 40 million men in the country. It is thus clear policy on men please only women allowed context. We do not want thematically not kick over the traces, after all it is the Ministry of Women, Family and "fuss" - including then falls probably somehow the man. Although he thus member of the family, itself a right to representation would be the father, and - in case of doubt against the mother.
If we reversed accept as women that the only official body that represents our interests, will be led by a man? I can hear the outcry. Widely it is among feminists think for this job you desperately need a womb, even if you do not use the same.
Accordingly, the variety of topics in the Mini Unit boys and men is not just wide. The two prestigious projects are: "More men in early childhood education" and the "Boys Day". Either way, projects in which men are to be thrilled for low-paid women's jobs, which increases their risk of landing 3d glamour in the same age poverty as many women. Is that really all there is to say from men point of view? Or is it not rather the only thing Mrs begrudge the men as a theme?
It must be possible just in the sense of equality that men interests must be equally clear and obvious articulated by both men and women's interests women. We women are not so squeamish.
The current women's quota debate 3d glamour shows that no small