Are we interested in em different future I am but how many are in today

On Monday, the eighteenth, held the March eco cafe in Umeå with Marie Persson from Tarnaby as protagonist. This meant that our modern society dependent on physical exploitation of the Earth at the center. Marie is the founder of The Network Stop the mine in Rönnbäck - a planned nickel mine in the Ume River, which would be significant risks for the whole valley beyond local devastation in a mining area the size of Umeå city. Still, she emphasized - of course - the positive in the fight against short-term exploitation. It's not at all about being against development; it's about being sustainable development. In the picture below you can also see Nina Hanson and Roger Olofsson from the network.
Whoever was in place and could listen damernas to Marie-initiated story was told the history, present and future, as well as nature, culture and daily life are woven together and contrasted with a remarkable damernas law, adapted to provide rapid exploitation for the benefit of short-term economic interests. Those who were not in place can still find a lot of traces of Marie's engagement online, as this press release and the report that she was chosen for this year Västerbotten. Marie during the lecture emphasized the importance of collaboration can among others illustrated here, in conjunction with a relay from Ojnareskogen. The network's blog, you can also read more about including this evening. damernas
The Swedish policy has unfortunately both made exploitation interests overriding other interests and led to negligible benefits to other stakeholders than the mining industry, which Marie compared with colonization. She also asked if we could pick up the oil in the Middle East in the same way that foreign companies are allowed, indeed encouraged, to retrieve minerals damernas in Sweden?
It is not only absurd from an environmental perspective to further push forward the transformation of "natural resources" to occasional damernas consumption, rapidly obsolete infrastructure and emissions; it is also remarkable that companies are allowed to earn and bring out big money on such activities while public services in the same regions being eroded more and more. A relevant tax stays at resorts could thus provide a brake with double positive effect: First, it would destructive exploitation rate is slowed down so that environmental values and prerequisites for good quality of life could be maintained, and, proceeds provide support for education, health care and more at the vulnerable rural municipalities where deposits are often found. Sorry seems too few of our politicians yet ripe to go such a route. Among café guests, however, was probably the most ready, and the evening ended with a discussion of how the responsible development could be run on. In these discussions was, in addition to those above, although Erik Danielsson from the Network Against Uranium Mining an active damernas party. damernas He glimpsed the bottom right of the picture which otherwise shows parts of the normally crowded room.
Annika Burholm writes: damernas
Well, two things about "mining cafe": 1) Johanna read two powerful poems by Harry Martinsson 2) I pointed at question time that we need to reduce the need for nickel by not replacing mobile every other damn year!
Right! To stay home and read poems sometimes when you really thought about going to Cnet and switch phones is also no stupid solution. On the contrary. It is one of countless examples of needed changes in how we view our daily worries and "need".
Are we interested in em different future I am but how many are in today's greed and decadence. damernas Today's advertising has made me say up boxer but of course I have a mobile but VK walked the same road can peek at vk mobile. Sew my own grocery bags and some to forbid plastkassarna.Vi can do a lot better if we want and learn to live a little healthier One who is about
What you write makes me think the myth that it has invested so much - be so expensive and demanding - if we are to put on. To NOT do so bad we would have done in the morning is in fact often a very cheap basic options. So here I am writing about it in my book (From financial to sustainable ...), in a response to a suggestion damernas of great bet for sustainability:
... Meanwhile, the question of resources be overemphasized in Brown's reasoning. War analogy is certainly true in the costs and hardship becomes enormous when the problems have grown up (it had been significantly much less expensive damernas to dispose of Hitler and other nazistkoryféer during the first half of the 1930s - and perhaps future historians to compare climate failure in Copenhagen in 2009 with the fiasco in Munich in 1938?). So far we have not been able to find excuses for our inaction in that it would be expensive to fix the environmental problems we cause. The relationship is exactly the opposite. The problems are basically that we are engaged in non-sustainable activities in too large scale. As long as we act quickly enough is a omstäl