It is interesting that both libertarians (advocates of dictatorship) and Communists (proponents of

Green Party goes like a train in opinion. After becoming the second largest party in the European elections, the party goes into the election campaign vanity fair archives with great confidence. Gustav Fridolin and Åsa Romson vanity fair archives both have an excellent vanity fair archives chance to call himself minister after the election. The Green Party has long been the media's gull pigs. Firstly, the party has strong support among journalists, and has been MP come to be regarded as some sort of nice third option in Swedish politics. While the Social Democrats and the Conservatives quarrel about taxes and benefits will the Green Party in from the edge and wants to save the environment. Anyone vanity fair archives against? Although MP, Is not quite as perverse in today as it was before it entered parliament, there is little doubt that there is a radical leftist with direct societal dangerous proposal. In brief, the party's policy on us to work as little as possible and be taxed as much as possible. MP is not alone. The characteristic feature of all left parties is that they want to distribute the value of a bourgeois growth vanity fair archives policies have enabled. It therefore vanity fair archives becomes absurd when both MP as V and fi factor in the value of the current economic policy in its reform and simultaneously proposes everything from tax shock on labor to zero growth. It is of course not together somewhere. But voters seem not so scrupulous. The Green Party has not been pushed much about the social impact of zero growth in the past, and will not need to worry about it in the fall either (Fi has been influenced by this lack of interest in credible economic proposals when they worked out their so-called economic program). The Social Democrats have at least understood that society needs growth, that certain taxes are especially harmful and that the tax rate can not be pushed up any amount without having a very negative impact. But the party is not in-government anymore but will be forced to bring in other parties in the government at an election victory. The Green Party stands first in the queue, and you want it badly Social Democrats have no choice but to give some ministerial posts also to the Left. It is a potentially lethal cocktail. vanity fair archives I do not think Stefan Löfven sleep particularly well at night. Read also: HAX
It is interesting that both libertarians (advocates of dictatorship) and Communists (proponents of the dictatorship of the proletariat are equally extensive problems with leaves., It can only mean that he is absolutely right on the scale when it comes to encompass the majority's wishes. 3 July 2014 11:14
Now you are there again: "radical left." http://www.vof.se/folkvett/ar-2001/nr-2/antroposofi-och-ekofascism/ http://nyliberal.tripod.com/index-9.html Just the ideological core of conservatism and hostility toward Western industrialization as the Greens have in common with eg Gothic Association, representing the solemn talk of "global justice" in the peculiar light. Their demands beats namely hardest at the poorest. In a lot of attraction documentary about the environmental movement "Mine your own business", depicted the conservative and nationalist indifference which in reality are among the so-called environmentalists, against poverty in other countries: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature = player_embedded & v = wth_p4p0rfY July 3, 2014 12:12
Asa Romson: Is the war in all of Africa? Have not all of Africa Black rule since long ie no problem with white men. As for Afghan refugees, it must seem like very strange from a leftist perspective that they flee TO the white man in the Christian / secular countries, those who attacked! In the Muslim world there are two big countries to escape to with no problem whatsoever with war or white male, Iran and Saudi. In short Asa Romson all refugees go to the white man, all refugees errors and the Green Party, right? vanity fair archives Correct me if I'm wrong! * How many EU countries have to pass before you reach Sweden by land via the Oresund Bridge which 70 percent are doing? In the war on the Danish side? Why not give them that sticks to a one-way vanity fair archives ticket back to Denmark. They have evidently been there. * How do you fly to Sweden without a passport? Which airlines, Immigration Service? Maybe time to investigate? * Why not introduce rules that make it less attractive to not be able / want to identify themselves. Eg high restrictiveness with PUT. / Micke mammma July 3, 2014 12:28
Anonymous 13:07: Who's talking about closing the Oresund bridge for job commuters vanity fair archives really? You talk a lot about this but I have never seen that suggestion come from "big Swedish chauvinists". Big difference between commuting across the Öresund Bridge and chartered government flight that gets "quota refugees" from the illiterate crowd, for example, Somalia (or other MENA countries). Somalia who are not even at war anymore and want to Somalis returning ... You fight like Don Quixote against imaginary windmills vanity fair archives as you tense up in front of yourself. The rest of us scratching our heads and wondering what