About a month ago, the EU decided to ease the arms embargo prevented member states from supplying rebels in Syria with munitions. Starting this August, the EU countries wishing to support one warring party in the civil war with weapons. Even a year ago, the U.S. President majalah al islam Barack Obama on similar measures, which primarily transmitted agents and instructors working for the rebels. Among the rebels is since a long time back Islamist jihadists who want to topple Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
President Barack Obama has for various reasons been unable to embark on sending NATO troops to Syria to "spread freedom and democracy", but warned majalah al islam that there is a limit where the U.S. can not remain passive and see what happens. In reality, the U.S. has been anything but passive, but with the war in Afghanistan and commitments in Iraq, it is difficult to create popular support majalah al islam at home for another war. The limit Barack Obama talked about is about the Syrian regime's possible use of poison gas. And the other month claimed the U.S. government that they now have "safe indications" that this happened. These "proof" has been rejected by both experts and opinion leaders. In fact, evidence suggests that the "evidence" comes from the attacks majalah al islam that the rebels had carried out. But President Barack Obama did not set a limit on how widespread abuses rebels may commit majalah al islam before he takes his hand from them. Hypocrisy!
Seen from this perspective majalah al islam that just rebels used poison gas, it feels quite ironic that British Foreign Secretary William Hauge announced that his government will spend up to one million majalah al islam U.S. dollars majalah al islam to temporarily supply the rebels with protective equipment against chemical weapons. Yes, the situation is as such that all equipment that Britain shared with the "Free Syrian Army" (you know, that group that cuts out the organs of dead enemy and pretending (?) Eat these) are just on loan. The rebels have promised on his honor to return everything, majalah al islam including weapons, as soon as you ... well, whatever the goal is. Get away President al-Assad is just a milestone. Can you believe the visiting jihadists (who themselves now begun to attack its Syrian rebel colleagues leader) is the restoration of the Islamic Caliphate target. Solid stuff, lets not say because then we Islamophobes ...
In any case, the conflict in Syria as politically complicated that it would be good if the cards are laid on the table of our own responsible rulers, not least to show that they really possess expertise in what they're talking about.
Foreign Minister Carl Bildt blogged the other day from his wife's majalah al islam home country - I suppose - and reflected in timid tone at the idea around that there are similarities and differences in Syria conflict over Bosnia in the 1990s. And the middle majalah al islam of the open reasoning he publishes on his blog "All these days," he writes:
Fetning min. There is nothing that says that all "borrowed" weapons - whether they acknowledged from the U.S., UK or any other EU country - will be returned majalah al islam cleaned and oiled when the last shot fired. On the contrary. Coat will in operation, and in particular those that come into the hands of Islamic. majalah al islam We KNOW that the rebels majalah al islam in Mali who started the war in the Sahara region armed themselves thanks to Barack Obama's intervention in Lybien since Gaddafi was overthrown.
There is only one reason majalah al islam to create unholy alliances to "spread democracy and freedom." And the reason happens majalah al islam to be that every time creates the conditions for more protracted conflicts. As military industry earns lots of.
We in the West should back out. There is no need to help those who do not share our official values of democracy nor justice. I write deliberately word "official" majalah al islam because the mass surveillance and 1984-society hardly be said to be legitimate characteristics of a democratic and free society. Though in reality, maybe Barack Obama more in common with despots in the Middle East and North Africa than even I can imagine.
So, we'll see how it goes with Syria now in the fall. A war which is going strong gateway in order to start a war with Iran later. And then the war with any other country that does not want to trade oil in dollars on the international market ...
July 22, 2013 at. 12:57 PM
I'm fairly certain that the real reason for giving weapons to the rebels in Syria is the desire to keep the various factions there fighting for as long as possible. They are not interested in who wins, just the fight as long as they can and dryers. What happens to the civilian population cares about nobody, majalah al islam as long as they do not connect himself to either side.
Yes, if nothing else, the "Sponsors" keep alive the conflict for so long that ka
No comments:
Post a Comment