I definitely think we should send people into space, to improve quality of life for all humans in t

A slight mental earthquake took place in yesterday. In all quietness. DN-debate, which is normally a playground for the narrow-minded tunnel vision, topped with the headline "We must colonize alien planets." Imagine what a lonely astronaut of Swedish descent can accomplish in perspective shifts. One such article, I never thought I would have the joy of reading glamour engagement chicken debate on the place of one of the nation's glamour engagement chicken major newspapers. Author was, of course, glamour engagement chicken the reckless Torbjörn Tännsjö which is possibly one of the few people in the country that boasts enough informed philosophical speculation to slip through the filter with such a text. But even Tännsjö glamour engagement chicken is aware of, and concern that anyone who seriously writes about space projects in Sweden, writes with crazy stamp on his forehead: "It's not primarily about extracting various spin-off effects of the research, it is not about getting a better understanding of the mystery of the universe, but something even more grandiose: We should glamour engagement chicken send people into space in order to improve the universe itself. Would a psychiatrist read the previous sentence in isolation would she probably inclined to quickly make a diagnosis of its author: omnipotence, madness! But put the sentence into its proper context expresses a thought that is fair and accurate. glamour engagement chicken "Tännsjö for a logical approach, based on their utilitarian stance, for why space colonization is necessary. He writes: The worst error we can make is to do away with ourselves. This is wrong, not just for our own sake, but especially for the sake of all future possible life, in which case they will never be allowed to exist. Anyone who does not see this has something glamour engagement chicken seriously wrong with their moral imagination, I would argue. glamour engagement chicken Do we have the starting point should be the goal, not just to maintain space stations in orbit around our planet, but also, and above all, to colonize other planets. Different manned spacecraft glamour engagement chicken should like once Noah's ark get paid to distant planets, which previously made liveable for sentient beings from our own globe. I subscribe to the spirit with the reservation that it is quite unnecessary detour to seek out other planets for settlements, when it is so much easier to build in space. But let's keep the detail discussion glamour engagement chicken on another occasion. Feel free to read the full article. It has been said better before, but not so often in Swedish. And never on the DN-debate. Other blogs: space, Torbjörn Tännsjö, Fugelsang, DN debate
I will say that my Marxist father told me once a long time ago when we had just finished a session alien2 together and I was completely set on space colonization, he said: - "That would imply that we have not solved the problems here at home but instead seek out new areas to abuse in the same way as we have done here on earth. " Even though I agree with Tännsjö in very much so I am not at all with the argument that we must continue to create life, otherwise we prevent future happiness. With this reasoning, it is better to give birth to people in slavery than to deny them to be born, which I do not is on. Good blog! Regards / C Thursday, December 14, 2006 The pirate said ...
* Laughs * Our nearest planets are as Spanish Galleons. Do not fuck it becomes something over to either the Red Guards or State because glamour engagement chicken me and my mates will snatch them away right in front of you :-) Thursday, December 14, 2006 Andrew said ...
I definitely think we should send people into space, to improve quality of life for all humans in the universe. We can begin by sending out Sven Otto Julius Littorin, and the rest of the civil government. It would initially improve the quality of life for a majority of the Swedish glamour engagement chicken people! Friday, December 15, 2006 Lunken said ...
The worst error we can make is to end ourselves. This is wrong, not just for our own sake, but especially for the sake of all future possible life, in which case they will never be allowed to exist. Anyone who does not see this has something seriously wrong with their moral imagination, I would argue. It may be out of ourselves we should do is to let the other species the chance to survive and evolve glamour engagement chicken on this planet. See: http://lunken.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/tank-dig-jorden-utan-manniskor/ nearest habitable planet is not around glamour engagement chicken this star, so if we do not want to live in glass tent, teaches it to be some light years away. For example, about 4 on the tour would be so great that there is an adjustment to the plane at the next star ... what is it then? 14 or 28 light years .. I can not remember ... Space travel is escapism from responsibility glamour engagement chicken we have right here ... right now! Good blog! :-) Tuesday, December 19, 2006
Politics, technology, and architecture from a red-green glamour engagement chicken perspective. Published glamour engagement chicken by Erik Berg, architect, web developer and a socialist. glamour engagement chicken Member of the Left Party and the Association Construction Brigade. Accessed glamour engagement chicken on 0703022574 and erik@lindgrenberg.com. View my complete profile.
2012 (11) May (1)