In a few months it is 20 years since one of the worst genocides that have occurred in modern sigrid

In a few months it is 20 years since one of the worst genocides that have occurred in modern sigrid combüchen history took place. 6 April 1994 assassinated Rwandan president and the day after even the Prime Minister. During the following three months murdered over 800,000 people, often using heavy weapons like machetes. There was systematic rape of men and women, two million people were forced to flee. UN and other major international organizations stood paralyzed whereupon they became embarrassed and indebted for not having prevented the genocide and their reliability was greatly undermined.
At a first look at the current situation in Rwanda and the rest of central Africa where many countries suffer from decades of unrest, wars and large crowds fleeing across borders, the situation can seem chaotic and the reasons for this may be difficult to discern. To even try to get close to potential answers on how the 100-day hell could break out, we must take a historical journey back to 1800 - and the 1900s and colonization *.
Germany colonized Rwanda in the 1880s but was after their loss in World War I had to give up the country to Belgium, sigrid combüchen which came to influence the country disastrously. The largest ethnic belongings sigrid combüchen Hutu, Tutsi and Twa had until colonization no decisive role in society, but was seen more as different clans within Rwanda's borders, but they were still a united people. The Belgian colonizers, however, took these belongings and they did so essential that they began to be classified as different sigrid combüchen races. Belgium administered the country, largely through the minority Tutsi, until 1962, when Rwanda regained sigrid combüchen its independence. During the Belgian rule had Tutsis, acting as "a race more like Europeans," had many advantages, which has created great dissatisfaction among the majority Hutu, culminating in a revolution in 1959 in which many Tutsis were forced to flee. Here, the Belgians a certain tinge and started to support the Hutus in their struggle for power. An escalation of violence began with Hutus who wanted to keep the Tutsis out of power and exiltutsier who wanted to make their way back from neighboring sigrid combüchen countries. 1973 Juvénal Habyarimana took power through a military coup and favored Hutus during his 20 years in power. 1990 invaded the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), mainly composed of Tutsis forced into exile, northern parts of Rwanda, which led to a weakening of the Habyarimana regime. The widespread alienation that occurred against the Tutsis through the media, especially by radio, was the core of the mobilization. The shooting down of the presidential plane in 1994 signaled the start of the genocide in which neighbors and even families were turned against each other. The Tutsis were the most vulnerable group, but also moderate Hutus and the already segregated twa severely affected by the violence.
* This short post is of course a (very) incomplete account of what happened in Rwanda from 1880 until today, but even so, it might be a good idea to understand the current sigrid combüchen situation from a colonization perspective.
About aworldofpeace Welcome to A World of Peace! We who run this blog called PCBP - People Can Build Peace and we are an NGO, that is a non-governmental organization, working on peace building. The blog is run voluntarily and is not tied to any political party, religious sigrid combüchen organization or government agency. But this should not be confused with neutrality, then we take a stand against oppression, discrimination, militarization, violence and warfare, while we stand for freedom, human rights, justice and non-violent methods in world politics, both for governments and for civil society actors. Our long term goal with this blog is to promote sustainable positive peace in the world. Johan Galtung, a peace foremost research profiles sigrid combüchen differed between negative and positive peace, in which negative peace is the absence of direct / physical violence, but it still is structural violence, which can be described as unequal life chances and cultural violence, which means that direct and structural violence is seen as normal, natural, or that we do not see it at all. Positive peace, on the other hand, the absence of all these kinds of violence, which means a state of equality, tolerance and understanding, and that all people can fulfill their potential. Our bit to reach this state of positive peace is this blog. Here we want to discourage violence as a legitimate political tool, raising awareness of Galtung's different definitions of violence, share knowledge, sigrid combüchen raise awareness and bring positive peace on the agenda! You could call us peace enthusiasts, but we are no perfect people. We also live in a consumer society, and we are also governed by norms and power structures. We do not trade all our clothes at second hand or have the entire pantry filled with CLAIMS, Fairtrade and Organic food. We are not vegans and we have never stopped any tank with our bare